More Affordable To Buy in 98% of Major Metros

by The KCM Crew on March 27, 2012

Last week, Trulia released their Winter 2012 Rent vs. Buy Index. In the index, they report that:

“After years of home price declines and tightening rental markets, home ownership is now more affordable than renting in all but two of the 100 largest metros – even in expensive real estate markets such as New York, Los Angeles and Boston.”

The two metros where renting was more affordable were Honolulu and San Francisco. However, Trulia explains that, even in these markets, buying a home:

“…might make sense for people who plan to stay in their next home for at least five years and can benefit from the mortgage-interest tax deduction.”

This rent/buy ratio favors buying more so then at almost any time in history. In a recent article, Forbes Magazine quotes Jed Kolko, Trulia’s chief economist:

“Certainly prices have continued to fall nationally, but rents have been rising so this would be the lowest price-to-rent ratio that we’ve seen.”

Bottom Line

It might be time to talk to a local real estate professional about the possibility that buying a home makes sense for you and family.

 

http://www.kcmblog.com/2012/03/27/more-affordable-to-buy-in-98-of-major-metros/

Architects and designers redefine what’s possible with shipping container homes. Photo: Architecture and Hygiene.

A trend in recycling structures not traditionally considered “real estate” is changing how potential home and business owners, not-for-profit organizations, government agencies and the U.S. military view shipping containers.

The use of rudimentary containers to ship cargo began in the late 17th century. By the 1950s, Malcolm McLean of Sea-Land Shipping, pushed by the U.S. military to standardize their design, was building strong, uniform, theft-resistant, stackable shipping containers that were easy to load and unload by truck, rail and ship, and easy to store.

In 2005, an estimated 18 million containers made a combined total of about 200 million trips. Many containers measure 20 feet or 40 feet in length, and a 40-foot-long shipping container offers 304 square feet of floor space.

A trade imbalance has led the containers piling up around U.S. hubs, and storing them increases the cost of doing business.

One response to the problem: Re-engineer the containers. As architects and designers around the world evolve and refine creative reuse, containers are reshaping as disaster-relief shelters, coffee shops, student housing, custom homes, retail towers, even storing physical books after they are digitized.

The richly furnished interior contrasts to the minimalist, industrial exterior. Photo: Architecture and Hygiene

Living in former shipping containers may have begun as a fringe novelty, but it is far from such these days. Many entrepreneurs are exploring new niches amid the growing assortment of shipping container-based structures.

Alex Klein of Container Home Consultants Inc. has been involved in shipping container conversions for 30 years, while Heather Levin said she appreciates container homes after noticing how much of her hard-earned dollars went to a bank as mortgage loan interest.

This container house in France was completed in 2010. Photo: CG Architects, France

Victor Wallace of ContainerHomes.info authored the free downloadable book, “The 30 Most Influential Shipping Container Homes Ever Built!” His website presents extensive tutorials and videos for container conversions and also offers a free download of the book with designs from around the world.

21st Century Homes & Structures builds modular homes and claims it is the “original approved shipping container home manufacturer in New York… certified since 1985.”

A colorful, lego-block-esque apartment complex in England. Photo: plentyofants|Flickr

That company reports that its modified shipping containers are “eco-friendly, (energy-efficient), hurricane-resistant, pest-free, affordable and green.” The company offers units in sizes ranging from 480 square feet to 1,280 feet, and prices starting at $89 per square foot. That does not include excavation site work and foundations. The company offers turnkey packages and ships throughout the U.S.

An Argentinian-born woman living in California identified by faircompanies.com as “Lulu” (no last name given), was reportedly forced by the recession to downsize, and found and modified a free shipping container. She took a couple of months to gather mostly recycled components to remodel the unit, faircompanies.com reported, and it took another month to convert the original 360-square-foot space into a home for herself and her small daughter.

Container homes can take on more conventional shapes as well. Photo: Alex Klein, Container Home Consultants Inc

With hot water on demand from a small camping device, and camping stoves for cooking, Lulu noted that her home features a separate bathroom and second bedroom, and she plans to add a teahouse and a greenhouse.

Sure takes “green building” to another dimension.

http://realestate.yahoo.com/promo/dream-homes-that-come-in-a-crate.html

WASHINGTON (Reuters) – The battered housing market looks to be on the mend as buyers make a tentative return and house prices stabilize.

Sales of new homes in February fell from January but jumped more than 11 percent compared with the same month last year and prices rose, according to data released on Friday that was in line with other recent signs of a slow recovery.

Big challenges lie ahead, most notably in the form of a glut of unsold properties – many of them foreclosures – and tight lending by banks. But even if the recovery is slow and bumpy, the worst of the six-year slump seems to be over.

“The housing market is slowly coming back. It’s still a depressed market, but it’s getting better. We have a long way to go,” said Patrick Newport, an economist at Global Insight in Lexington, Massachusetts.

New home sales slipped 1.6 percent to a seasonally adjusted 313,000-unit annual rate in February, the lowest since October, but were up 11.4 percent in year-on-year terms, the Commerce Department said.

The median new home price jumped 8.3 percent to an eight-month high of $233,700. Compared with February last year, the rise was 6.2 percent.

The report rounded off a week of mixed U.S. housing data and followed a similar pattern seen in the bigger market for existing homes – sales also fell in February, but stayed close to their highest level in nearly two years and prices rose for the first time on a yearly basis since November 2010.

Realtors say they are seeing higher traffic volume and are moving more houses off the market than a few years ago.

“My listings are selling much more quickly compared to the past few years, even approaching 2007 pre-crash levels,” said Lindsey Sanders, a Realtor with Muffley & Associates in Atlanta.

“I began seeing a meaningful uptick in open house traffic last summer and it has continued to improve. I think this is a combination of sellers finally becoming more willing to ask market prices for their homes instead of bubble-level prices.”

Builders tell a similar story. An index measuring confidence among homebuilders held at a near four-year high this month and they anticipated an increase in sales over the next six months.

While the pace of home construction fell last month, permits for future projects approached a 3-1/2-year high. Much of the activity is concentrated in the multi-family segment, as demand for rentals soars.

SPOTTY RECOVERY

The recovery remains spotty. According to CoreLogic, for every two homes sold, there is one that could be foreclosed. It estimated the so-called shadow inventory of homes at 1.6 million in January, down from 1.8 million a year ago.

KB Home, the fifth-largest U.S. homebuilder, on Friday said net orders for new homes declined 8 percent in its first quarter as cancellations rose.

“Don’t expect this to be a broad-based, rocket-ship recovery,” said KB Homes Chief Executive Officer Jeff Mezger on an earnings call. “The overall housing market is better, but this is definitely a localized recovery … and in some cases, it’s a zip-code-by-zip-code recovery.”

KB’s order decline was in sharp contrast to the strong order growth reported by other U.S. homebuilders, including D.R. Horton, Pulte and Lennar, who have forecast an improving housing market.

While the pace of new home sales held above 300,000 units for a sixth straight month, they are just over a fifth of their 1.389 million unit peak reached in July 2005.

“Mindful that more healing needs to be done, we expect new home sales in 2012 to post their first annual increase in seven years, rising 12 percent,” said Sam Bullard, a senior economist at Wells Fargo Securities in Charlotte, North Carolina.

Last month, the inventory of new homes on the market was unchanged at a record low 150,000 units. At February’s sales pace it would take 5.8 months to clear the houses from the market, up from 5.7 months in January.

New home sales last month surged in the Northeast and West but slumped in the South and Midwest.

New home sales account for about 7 percent of the overall housing market and face stiff competition from the used home segment despite low levels of stock.

“Buyers have been able to take their time as they have little fear that prices or rates will get away from them. Mortgage rates, though, are beginning to rise slowly and that could continue through the rest of the year,” said Joel Naroff, chief economist at Naroff Economic Advisors in Holland, Pennsylvania.

“Add price increases to that and there is a little more urgency to the decision. So while investors may be disappointed by this report, I think better times are just about here so be a little more patient.”

http://news.yahoo.com/home-sales-slip-prices-8-month-high-143754718.html

Conventional wisdom, as it relates to houses, is often too much convention and not enough wisdom.

Every year, somebody publishes a list of which conventional home improvements will give you the best (or the worst) return on your remodeling investment.

Remodel a bathroom. Replace your siding. Don’t build a swimming pool. Paint everything neutral colors.

Sit up straight. Get a haircut. Call your mother.

If return on investment (ROI) is why you bought a home, or why  you’re remodeling one, you can stop reading now. Because the rest of  this article isn’t for you.

Three, two, one … still here?

You invest in your home to improve livability first, not value. If  you get more value in the process, consider it a bonus, but don’t make  ROI your prime directive.

Otherwise, you’ll end up like the potential client who came into my  office a few years ago with a three-page, single-spaced typewritten (as  in made with a “typewriter”) list of things he wanted in his house.

His list included this line: “A large dining room, near the kitchen.  Although we don’t need or want a dining room.” Why would he want to  build a room he didn’t need?

Because he’s thinking of things to make the house valuable, instead of things to make it livable.

So let me rephrase the remodeling-ROI question this way: What are  some cost-effective ways to improve the livability of your house?

Here’s my short list:

1. Walk-in pantry instead of kitchen cabinets

Kitchen cabinets are expensive. Half of them are up high on the wall  where they’re hard to reach, and the wall space they take up could be  better used for windows. A pantry takes up less space, stores a lot  more, is much easier to use, and costs less to build.

2. Comfortable shower instead of big bathtub

My firm does a lot of work in late-’70s/early-’80s neighborhoods that  are loaded with huge tubs. We’re taking them all out, one at a time, and  replacing them with comfortably sized showers (not the  racquetball court-sized ones you see in home shows) that people actually  use every day.

A shower takes up less space, uses less hot water, and is far more sanitary than a big tub.

3. Group windows together facing best views instead of scattering them around the house

Got a great view somewhere? Bring it into the house with lots of  glass. Take excess windows from bedrooms and bathrooms and use them to  connect the inside of the house with the outside.

We once remodeled a house on the coast of Lake Erie that had one  window — one — facing the lake. Hey, pal, did you notice you have one of the Great Lakes in  your backyard?

4. Keep ceiling heights reasonable for the room size

“Volume” ceilings do not automatically make better rooms. They just  make taller rooms, rooms that are harder to decorate and more expensive  to heat and cool.

Instead, focus attention on a view, a large fireplace  or other element — and away from the ceiling height. Use wall trim and  multiple paint colors to break up the volume of the room and create the  illusion of height.

5. Spend more time planning, and less money building

I toured a client’s existing home before we began designing the new  one. “Of course,” she said as we peeked in on the kids’ rooms, “These bedrooms are way too small.”

“Really?” I thought. The smallest was  probably 14 feet by 15 feet. But each bedroom had at least one door or one window  on each wall.

Pretty, but the design left little room for furniture.

I suggested we more carefully design the new bedrooms, keeping the  furniture placement in mind. In the end, we were able to easily  accommodate each child’s bedroom furniture comfortably in smaller  bedrooms than what they’d had before.

6. Consider the simple elegance of the box-form house

Subtlety and restraint used to be virtues in home design. These days,  far too often, inexperienced designers attempt to attract attention to  their homes by adding more stuff: more gables, more materials, more  bay windows, etc. Others know that proper proportion, scale and details are  what turn heads.

The simple box-house is a classic American form that’s survived 150  years of stylistic changes. Greek Revival, American Four-Square,  Tidewater Georgian … all simple boxes. Great proportions, great  details … done.

And here’s a bonus: The box-form is easier and cheaper to build, and because it encloses a larger volume in less perimeter, it’s less expensive to heat, cool and maintain.

7. Share part of the master bath

This isn’t for everyone, but it really tightens up the budget and the  floor plan. Make the toilet and a sink in the master bath accessible to  the rest of the house, instead of building a separate half-bath — it  won’t be used much by you during the day, and rarely by guests at night.

Why have two baths when one will do?

8. Spend it when you have it, not before

Sure, it’d be great to have those granite countertops now, but your  budget’s tight and granite is 10 times the cost of laminate tops. So  how about putting in nice laminate tops now, and replacing them with  granite in five years when you have the cash? You can easily do the same  with light fixtures, flooring, window treatment …

9. Compartmentalized bath — two baths in the space of 1 1/2 baths

Each kid doesn’t need a personal bathroom, but does need privacy and  room to share. A compartmentalized bath puts two sinks in one room and  the toilet and tub/shower in another, so three kids can use the bath at  once and keep a little more harmony in the family home.

I doubt any of these ideas will ever make a magazine’s list of “Best  Remodeling ROI” projects. But every one saves you money over a more  “conventional” design strategy, and every one increases the livability  of your home.

http://lowes.inman.com/newsletter/2012/03/22/news/182485

Economy Warming with the Weather

Though the risk of a spike in energy prices looms, there’s mounting evidence  that this time, economic recovery is for real.

By John Maggs, Senior Economics Editor, The Kiplinger Letter

March 14, 2012

The economy has been heating up as much as the weather lately, but is it  only another false spring?

We don’t think so. Unlike 2010 and 2011, when early economic gains  withered on the vine, this year’s green shoots will bear fruit.

We’ll forgive you if you harbor some doubts. In 2010, after the worst and  longest recession since the 1930s, the economy grew at nearly a 4% rate through  June, and it looked as if a self-sustaining recovery had begun. But growth slowed sharply in the second half of the year, and  businesses shelved expansion plans. Similarly, in the spring of 2011, strong job  numbers made it seem as if the economy was back on track. In February, March and  April, employers added more than 200,000 jobs in each month, the first time that  had happened since 2006. Then employment gains plunged, and the economic growth  hit the brakes. U.S. gross domestic product ended up an anemic 1.7% for the  year.

This year, there’s more evidence of sustained recovery.

Consumers are starting to spend more. Cars and trucks are flying off  dealer lots, at the fastest pace since before the recession. February’s sales,  at an annualized rate of 15 million autos, will ease off in the coming months,  but sales this year may be close to 14 million, up from less than 11 million in  2009 and 13 million last year.

Retail sales are also strong. After a solid holiday season, retailers report  that sales are still growing, up 1.1% in February, normally a time when  consumers are hanging around the house waiting for the thaw. Warm weather helped  get them out to stores, and they did more than window shop. Overall retail sales  in February were 6.3% higher than a year earlier. Sales were up even more at  chain stores — 6.7%.

Unseasonable weather may not continue, but surging consumer confidence  indicates that the acceleration in spending will. The Conference Board’s  confidence index is up 30 points since October, to a reading of 70.1. That’s the  largest increase over a four-month span in more than 30 years. Consumers are  also signaling their confidence by borrowing more. Revolving debt — student and  auto loans, credit cards, etc. — is rising.

Meanwhile, the benefits to employers of cost cutting are fading. Productivity  — the output per worker — surged in the Great Recession and its immediate  aftermath, as employers slashed payrolls to stay competitive. In 2010,  productivity increased by 4%, above the long-run average of about 2% a year. But  growth stopped cold in 2011, actually falling for part of the year and ending  the year up a mere 0.4%.

Normally, low productivity growth is bad news because it holds down wages.  But in an economy with 8 million people actively looking for work, it’s good  news. We expect productivity gains to continue to languish in 2012, forcing  businesses that want to expand to hire workers. That, in turn, should spur  economic growth.

It’s also encouraging that job growth is becoming more consistent. Based on  the lower level of new claims for unemployment insurance this month, it is  likely that March will be another month of job gains north of 200,000. One of  the most discouraging things about the recovery since the Great Recession has  been the stop-and-start nature of economic growth and job creation. Though GDP  gains in the first half of 2012 won’t be spectacular — an annual rate of only  about 2% — more-consistent net job creation will reinforce consumer  confidence.

There are even signs of improvement in housing, still the biggest drag  on the economy. The inventory of unsold homes is dropping — at last count, to  the equivalent of about six months of sales at the current pace of closings. The  combination of mild weather, low mortgage interest rates and the prospect of  those rates turning around once the economy picks up some steam is luring more  traffic into open houses. At the same time, real estate brokers say sellers have  gotten more realistic about sales prices, finally accepting that the bubble  prices of a few years back are gone. Unfortunately, with millions of  foreclosures still in the pipeline, the modest improvement we expect in housing  prices by the end of the year won’t do much to nurture growth.

Finally, some clouds on the horizon look less threatening. Europe’s  debt crisis will calm down, now that holders of Greek bonds have agreed to write  off most of their investments. A repeat of last year’s fiscal brinkmanship in  Washington isn’t likely. The posturing angered voters, and members of Congress  won’t want to play chicken again before facing voters in November.

One major thundercloud remains: The prospect of a sharp spike in oil prices  if Israel attacks Iran to thwart its pursuit of nuclear weapons. An attack would  drive gasoline over $5 a gallon and raise the average cost of filling up for  each U.S. household by $1,000 a year. Such a shock would lower the growth in  U.S. GDP next year from around 2% to 1%, leaving the economy one adverse event  away from a recession. Although the chances for an attack in the coming weeks  are lower since Israel agreed to another round of diplomacy, the risk can’t be  ignored.

http://www.kiplinger.com/columns/practical-economics/archives/economy-improving-2012.html

We announced previously that Penny was named the top agent for Coldwell Banker’s Basking Ridge and Bernardsville offices for 20011.  Now we can note that Penny has been recognized as one of Coldwell Banker’s top producers internationally as well.

Coldwell Banker announces Somerset County International President’s Award winners

Hal Maxwell, President of Coldwell Banker Residential Brokerage in New Jersey and Rockland County, New York, is proud to announce the Somerset County sales associates who have earned the company’s International President’s Awards for their sales success in 2011.

The winners, listed by office location, include:  International President’s Elite (Top 2% of 85,000 Coldwell Banker sales associates internationally) Penny Toombs, Basking Ridge

A hearty Thank You!  goes out to all of Penny’s clients, associates and friends.  She would not have achieved this recognition without you, and is looking forward to 2012 for even bigger and better things.


 

Capital Economics expects the housing crisis to end this year, according to a report released Tuesday. One of the reasons: loosening credit.

The analytics firm notes the average credit score required to attain a mortgage loan is 700. While this is higher than scores required prior to the crisis, it is constant with requirements one year ago.

Additionally, a Fed Senior Loan Officer Survey found credit requirements in the fourth quarter were consistent with the past three quarters.

However, other market indicators point not just to a stabilization of mortgage lending standards, but also a loosening of credit availability.

Banks are now lending amounts up to 3.5 times borrower earnings. This is up from a low during the crisis of 3.2 times borrower earnings.

Banks are also loosening loan-to-value ratios (LTV), which Capital Economics denotes “the clearest sign yet of an improvement in mortgage credit conditions.”

In contrast to a low of 74 percent reached in mid-2010, banks are now lending at 82 percent LTV.

While credit conditions may have loosened slightly, some potential homebuyers are still struggling with credit requirements. In fact, Capital Economics points out that in November 8 percent of contract cancellations were the result of a potential buyer not qualifying for a loan.

Additionally, Capital Economics says “any improvement in credit conditions won’t be significant enough to generate actual house price gains,” and potential ramifications from the euro-zone pose a threat to future credit availability.

http://www.linkedin.com/news?actionBar=&articleID=5567733516482908167&ids=d3sSe30PdP4Qe3wUc38MdjwRdiMSdPAUejAOdjkQdzcSdzkPe3kRb34OdjoMdPcTc3wRc30Se3gUdjkIczcTc3wSdzcOdPkMd3oPczwRdiMTdz4Uc3AOe3gScjkPcPsTdzkR&aag=true&freq=weekly&trk=eml-tod2-b-ttl-0&ut=2nnci1_L2gFR81

REThink Real Estate

By Tara-Nicholle Nelson, Thursday, March 8, 2012.

Inman News®

 

I’m a proponent of listing with an agent with as deep a  local knowledge and relationship base as possible. With buying, things can be a  little bit different — especially if you are relocating and looking at a wide  range of areas.

Unless you’re house hunting in a super-specialized neighborhood  or for a unique property type, like a Manhattan co-op, any buyer’s agent from  the general area can get familiar with a neighborhood in that region pretty  quickly if he or she is up to speed on the basics of doing deals in an area.

When it comes to selling, though, it’s quite a bit tougher, especially  on today’s tough-to-sell market where pricing and marketing nuances (along with  vendor, lender and inspector relationships, and contacts with buyer’s brokers  and buyers themselves) are crucial to get homes sold.

Before we get into the details of what a local specialist  has that another agent might not, though, I do want to say this: I don’t know  your local market, but in many areas of the country even the most local, smartest,  most aggressive, best-marketing listing agent might not be able to move a home  in five months or less. Frankly, the best agent cannot move an overpriced or  poorly prepared home.

And the fact is that nonlocal, specialist agents do provide  sound advice on pricing, preparation, marketing and strategy to sellers every  single day across the country. So, while a local-area specialist might have a  leg up on another agent based on relationships and insider knowledge, that is  no guarantee that he or she will be superior to the agent you have right now.

So, before you go through the upheaval of finding another  agent, ask yourself:

  • Do the challenges you have with your current agent actually  have anything to do with her relative “outsider-dom”?
  • Has your current agent given you any advice on  getting your home sold that you have failed to follow (i.e., cut the price,  clear the clutter, hire a stager, etc.)?

If you are not following your current agent’s advice, then  you should think twice before firing her because your home hasn’t sold. Hiring  another agent will not resolve your problem if your home is still overpriced or  underprepared.

So, assuming you are willing to do everything within your  power to price and prepare your home fairly, here are some of the considerations  that tilt my general opinion in favor of a local listing agent vs. an agent  from outside the area:

1. Local agents may  have insider marketing knowledge. In certain neighborhoods in my town, for  example, the standard practice is to:

  • List a home midweek.
  • Hold it open for brokers only on Thursday — and advertise  those on agent-only fliers.
  • Not allow it to be shown otherwise until the Sunday open  house.
  • Hold it open for two Sundays.
  • Take offers the Tuesday or Wednesday following the second  open house.

Agents from surrounding areas could probably guess at some but  not all of these things, but often they don’t. And that lack of insider knowledge  might actually prevent out-of-the-area agents from getting the fullest exposure  for their listings.

For example, if you just took the first offer that came in,  you might forgo the offer of a local buyer who was expecting to have two  weekends to get to the place.

2. Local agents may  have relationships outsiders don’t. They may know the other agents in town,  and be able to market the property to them casually, as they run into them in  the grocery store or at local meetings, in a way that (a) works and (b) an  agent from outside the area cannot. They also will have the built-in marketing  channel of being able to market to agents inside their own office — not to  mention the buyers they represent.

Finally, local agents might know the inspectors, appraisers,  even lenders (i.e., all the pros who have to work together to close a deal) and  have a relationship of trust with them that a stranger does not.

And that includes being able to find contractors or other  vendors who will do repair work at better prices or on better terms than they  would offer to a stranger.

3. Local agents might  have a leg up on pricing. Possibly the strongest argument for working with  a local listing agent is that they know what local buyers want, care about and  deprioritize. That means they understand local pricing nuances better, having  worked with local buyers, and having viewed and/or sold recent homes nearby.

You don’t have to have been in the market long to understand  that photos can be misleading and that location nuances weigh heavily on the  prices that buyers are willing to pay, so the history of having actually been  to and inside the comparable sold listings — rather than just having seen them  online, can be critically important to understanding how comparable they are to  your home, and how your home should be priced accordingly.

Address Listing Price Selling Price
116  Irving Place $229,000 $215,000
154  Alexandria Way $234,000 $227,500
186  Potomac Drive $264,900 $253,000
60  Smithfield Court $279,900 $255,000
58  Woodward Lane $299,900 $278,000
30  Village Drive $339,000 $330,000
10  Cannon Court $479,900 $475,000
15  Battalion Drive $519,900 $500,000
180  Smoke Rise Road $695,000 $661,000
49  Hansom Road $709,900 $696,000
23  Princeton Court $724,900 $703,000
89 Dyckman Place $715,000 $741,900
86  Childs Road $854,900 $800,000
135  Woods End $899,000 $880,000
21  Beacon Crest Drive $1,100,000 $1,040,000
17  Cedar Creek Drive $1,250,000 $1,220,000
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 176 other followers